Dems: Trump’s environmental rollbacks harm communities of color
President Donald J. Trump delivers remarks on the death of Soleimani at Mar-a-Lago on Friday, January 3, 2010, in Palm Beach, Florida. | Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead via Flickr Public Domain
WASHINGTON — The President Trump administration is suspending key environmental reviews during the pandemic that critics warn could further harm poor and minority neighborhoods in Michigan and around the country.
Lawmakers and activists say the administration’s actions — meant to boost the lagging economy — could have disproportionate effects on minority communities that live near pipeline and power projects. Local communities are at risk of missing the chance to weigh in on decisions and they could face more pollution entering their communities.
“For too long, Black and Brown and underserved communities have suffered the devastating impacts of environmental injustice, living on the front lines of our climate crisis and fence lines of polluting industries, often without the necessary resources to respond to the impact nor the influence in the political process to promote equitable outcomes,” U.S. Rep. Donald McEachin, a Virginia Democrat, said at a hearing on Capitol Hill.
Michigan residents decry environmental injustice at Detroit congressional hearing
“The fact that Black Americans are disproportionately dying of COVID-19 exposes the deadly consequences of this truth. It is a truth that we cannot and will not accept.” McEachin added.
Nationally, Black people are dying of COVID-19 at a rate almost two times higher than their population share. Black people account for 40% of the deaths from COVID-19 in Michigan, but only make up only 14% of the population in the state.
Some lawmakers are pushing for more federal investment in environmental justice in pandemic response bills. They included several provisions in the HEROES Act, a $3 trillion coronavirus relief bill House Democrats approved in May. Senate Republicans have said they would not advance the measure.
The HEROES Act includes language that would invest in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental justice programs. The legislation would monitor pollution and investigate the effects of COVID-19 on environmental justice communities. It also includes language that would prohibit water shutoffs in cities and counties that receive COVID-19 relief aid.
“We have to renew our fight for greater environmental justice,” said U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Dearborn). “Every bill the Congress considers now must take these issues into account.”
Mustafa Santiago Ali — who helped found the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) environmental justice program — is concerned about vulnerable communities who live near power plants and pipelines. Poor air quality and higher rates of asthma create disparities that are further highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
“More people are going to get sick and more people are going to lose their lives,” Ali told lawmakers at the hearing. Ali, a 24-year veteran of the EPA, is now a vice president at the National Advocacy Center at the National Wildlife Federation.
“When we say, ‘I can’t breathe,’ we literally can’t breathe,” said Ali, echoing the words of George Floyd, who died in police custody in Minneapolis. Floyd’s words, captured in a video that showed a police officer kneeling on his neck for nearly nine minutes, have become a rallying cry in the nationwide protests for racial equality in recent weeks.
The NAACP estimates that 71% of Black Americans live in counties in violation of federal air pollution standards.
Those communities often have worse health outcomes and higher rates of asthma and cancer, an issue that has become more pronounced as the COVID-19 respiratory illness has added another threat.
‘Free pass to polluters’
The Trump administration has pushed to expedite reviews of infrastructure projects during the coronavirus pandemic and waived some enforcement of pollution laws — a move that advocates are afraid could further harm communities that live near the projects.
Trump signed an executive order earlier this month that allows infrastructure projects to sidestep some requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, one of the nation’s bedrock environmental laws. NEPA requires public input and reviews of projects’ potential effects on the environment. The White House invoked emergency authorities to expedite projects and skip the reviews.
The changes could lead to rapid approval of highways, larger oil and gas projects and pipelines.
“We are gravely concerned with the lift on environmental reviews,” said Tim Cywinski of the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club. “Trump is exploiting this crisis as an excuse to give a free pass to polluters.”
The EPA also implemented a temporary policy to relax some of the reporting and monitoring requirements usually required under the clean air and water laws.
Georgia Republican U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter said he thinks the temporary policy has been “somewhat misrepresented.” The EPA “has continued to enforce our nation’s environmental laws and work with federal, state, and tribal communities,” Carter said at the hearing in the House Energy & Commerce Committee last week.
House Democrats who lead the committees that oversee EPA sent a letter to Administrator Andrew Wheeler last week asking him to review whether any industries polluted as a result of the policy.
The EPA has not publicly reported on pollution levels during the pandemic. But the agency says air quality is improving in the United States overall. In an air quality report the agency sent to Congress on June 8, Wheeler said that average concentrations are down to some of the lowest levels on record in 2019.
‘The deck is stacked against us’
Several recent studies have highlighted the effects of polluting infrastructure near Black, Latino and Native American Communities.
A study from EPA in 2018 found nationwide disparities in air pollution — with Black Americans experiencing higher levels of air pollution than whites and disparities more pronounced for Blacks than on the basis of poverty. Another study from the National Institute of Health in 2011 found that communities of color and low-income populations are disproportionately exposed to chemical releases.
And a study published last year in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences found “pollution inequity”: that Black Americans are typically exposed to 56% more pollution than they produce. By contrast, the researchers concluded that white people are typically exposed to less pollution than they produce through consumption and daily activities.
“At every turn the deck is stacked against us,” said Jacqueline Patterson, Director of the NAACP Environmental and Climate Justice Program.
“The same systemic inequities that make certain populations differentially vulnerable to various impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic are the same systemic inequities that comprise the root causes driving environmental injustice,” Patterson said.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.